Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Item vs Field

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2010

    Lightbulb Item vs Field

    we are starting to use LS and we have some questions.

    Logically, we are using LS infrastructure because we have a realtime application, strongly based on all system performances.

    We have a regular update (or LS Event), and in this event we have to change a lot of data. Conceptually this data are divided in many items (there are a list of objects traduced in LS items), but all items have to be modified at the same moment.

    So, talking about system performances, does LS manage in the same mode items and fields? And more clearly: Will be a single item update with a lot of fields faster then many item with few fields?

    Thank you

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    If fields of all items change at the same time, then using a single aggregated item will be more efficient. It might not be faster, unless the Server is under severe stress.

    On the other hand, if you need that the updates for all items reach the client at the same time, then using a single aggregated items is the only choice, as updates for different items are managed independent of one another;
    hence, updates produced in short sequence by the Data Adapter might be sent to the client in different packets.



Similar Threads

  1. on field missing error on javascript execution
    By betasec in forum Client SDKs
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: June 8th, 2012, 08:52 AM
  2. getting field value directly via javascript
    By pluczak in forum Client SDKs
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: April 3rd, 2012, 09:36 AM
  3. Replies: 2
    Last Post: December 24th, 2010, 07:51 AM
  4. Replies: 1
    Last Post: November 2nd, 2009, 04:55 PM


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:22 AM.