-
March 7th, 2008, 02:32 PM
#11
May you please provide us with more details on the expected and observed behaviour? What makes you feel that the update sequence is unnatural?
Note that if your application sends 2-3 kb fields and there are as many as 256 fields in an item and the fields change frequently, then the bottleneck might be on the client side as well.
Are those fields images that the client renders on the screen?
If the different fields are not meant to be updated by the client at the same time, you could rather try to define 256 items with one field each and see if the final effect is better.
Similar Threads
-
By lisicnu in forum Adapter SDKs
Replies: 3
Last Post: December 8th, 2011, 02:41 AM
-
By webfg in forum Client SDKs
Replies: 2
Last Post: April 13th, 2009, 11:07 AM
-
By VietXuan in forum Adapter SDKs
Replies: 3
Last Post: November 5th, 2007, 09:41 AM
-
By shobha in forum Adapter SDKs
Replies: 4
Last Post: August 13th, 2007, 01:32 PM
-
By Alessandro in forum General
Replies: 0
Last Post: March 27th, 2007, 11:42 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:21 AM.
Bookmarks