Hi,

I think there could be an architectural misconception at the basis.
In most application architectures, one Data Adapter only is used to provide all the items. In some cases, two or three Data Adapter have proven to be the right solution. But I have never heard of anyone needing more than five Data Adapter mounted on the same server.

Could you please clarify your use case based on 50 different Data Adapters?

To answer your specific questions:
- There no limit imposed by the Eval license
- Using different engine names does not have any impact on scalability.

Cheers