-
May 30th, 2012, 09:44 AM
#4
As you referred to a paragraph of Clustering.pdf that is only present in Lightstreamer Colosseo but are using quite an old version of Lightstreamer, this may create confusion, as some details are different between the two versions.
That said, yes, your can take inspiration on paragraph 2.2.1.1 of the Colosseo version of the document.
In a multihosting scenario, as we know, the PushPage must address the Server with a URL which is consistent with the URL used by the browser to address the page.
This should be an application job, which should not involve Lightstreamer directly.
However, if you are in a clustering scenario and are leveraging the <control_link_address> and/or <control_link_machine_name> to ensure the "stickyness" behavior, then the URL used by the PushPage to address the Server is determined by that setting.
Hence you have no choice but to set the optional <control_link_machine_name>, which overrides <control_link_address>, to ensure that the Server identifies itself in a way consistent with the one used by the client to address it.
Moreover, if your constraint is that only the Load Balancer should be visible from the internet and if you don't use https, so that the Load Balancer is able to route the requests based on the "host" header, then yes, you can refer to the table in paragraph 2.2.1.1
Similar Threads
-
By yzhengyu in forum General
Replies: 1
Last Post: January 20th, 2011, 11:22 AM
-
By chanro4 in forum Client SDKs
Replies: 4
Last Post: January 19th, 2011, 09:29 AM
-
By karthik in forum Client SDKs
Replies: 2
Last Post: August 24th, 2010, 07:11 AM
-
By kumar117 in forum General
Replies: 3
Last Post: June 11th, 2010, 09:45 AM
-
By pisak in forum Client SDKs
Replies: 1
Last Post: January 23rd, 2008, 03:10 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:45 AM.
Bookmarks